KindEd
- United States
- Nonprofit
Youth social media usage is nearly universal, and it is exacerbating a global mental health crisis doubling youth risk for outcomes such as depression and anxiety depending on the type of content they consume or are exposed to. In the US alone, up to 95% of 13-17 year olds report using a social media platform, with higher levels of social media use found in Black and Latino youth and those of low-income backgrounds. Research from 2017-18 showed adolescents from lower socioeconomic contexts were also more likely to report problematic social media use, which is demonstrably linked to adverse mental health effects. This disproportionate distribution of negative impacts towards disadvantaged groups further perpetuates inequality in society.
The UN Global Issues report on Child and Youth Safety Online details that 79% of 14-25 year olds were online in 2023. While social media has clear benefits, evidence collected over the last 15 years shows that social media has the power to harm youth mental health globally. In the study, over ⅓ of adolescents in 30 countries reported being cyberbullied, with 1 in 5 skipping school because of it. The mental health crisis youth face online is further exacerbated by their exposure to harmful content online, such as hate speech, violent content, self-harm messages, sexual exploitation, abuse, and human trafficking. The proliferation of this kind of content among users is a by-product of AI-driven content personalization based on user behavior.
While the pandemic exacerbated social media use, research showed both positive and negative impacts of social media use on adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Positives include sustained connection to friends, family, and community while negatives include lower self-esteem and increased incidence of eating disorders. Irrespective of the pandemic, the rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide in youth were already climbing because of increased social media use. The adolescent mind is particularly vulnerable to social media effects because the connections between the emotional and the decision-making areas of their brains are still developing.
The growing influence of social media on children in Chicago and beyond is evident, with nearly 70% of parents citing technology and social media as the top two reasons parenting is now more difficult than it was 20 years ago. According to the National Scientific Council on Adolescence, child and adolescent use of platforms designed for adults places them at high risk of being exposed to content that is unsupervised, developmentally inappropriate, and potentially harmful.
In the U.S., deterring the adverse effects of social media usage is primarily assumed to be the parent's responsibility. While nearly all parents believe they have a responsibility to protect their children, mitigating the risk of harm from social media cannot be entirely placed on families alone. Social media companies, governments, the education system, and communities also hold a stake and responsibility in the social apparatus around child development and safety. We must provide children and their families with the knowledge and tools to navigate the existing digital environment in healthy ways.
Social media usage impacts the social-emotional well-being of children and those they engage with online. We provide a social media education curriculum with the latest learning sciences, proven practices, and a student-centered approach.
Social media is a tool, neither good nor bad. It is user behavior that drives positive and negative outcomes. KindEd’s curriculum aims to develop youth agency--the sense of control a person feels over their thoughts and behaviors--in order to drive healthy usage patterns among users. While mental health risks are highly correlated with lower levels of agency, high levels of agency aids mental stability in the face of conflict or change.
Our approach also addresses the need for students to become informed, ethical, and responsible social media users, which is hindered by their current lack of awareness about their usage habits, the algorithm design, and the effects of dynamics driving content creation (e.g., incentives, misinformation, the positivity bias, etc.). We deliver information about core features and domain-specific knowledge on social media and AI. Our learning model engages students through real-world connections, exploration, and high-level questioning to understand how they can use social media in a healthy manner. By recognizing their control over their actions and the resulting consequences, our curriculum reduces the risks of mental health and school-based problems related to social media use.
Curriculum design and high-quality instruction are equally important to maximizing student learning and high levels of engagement. High levels of engagement in learning result in improved information retention, increased motivation, and higher levels of achievement. Our participatory model provides comprehensive social media education focused on quality and type of use, avoiding the pitfalls of moral panic rooted in other forms of social education that suggest abstention and restrictions, which do not resonate with youth and are largely ineffective.
There is no one solution to the social media problem among youth, and the causal relationships between the amount of time spent on social media and mental health issues have mixed results. Thus, we focus on the quality of use. Our curriculum is the solution in bringing mindfulness and intentionality around social media use. Students engage in a variety of activities exploring a wide range of social media relationships and topics. Ultimately, students choose how they will engage in healthy social media use for themselves and others.
KindEd plans to provide social media education to children of all ages.
Adolescents in sixth to eleventh grade are our initial target group, specifically those that report high social media usage and are most vulnerable to harmful impacts. Currently, we focus on serving a diverse socio-economic and racial population within Chicago Public Schools, wherein negative effects are most significant due to the way use compounds societal inequities.
There are currently no requirements for social media education in Illinois or Chicago. While there exists programs and policies, such as zero-tolerance, aimed at addressing student well-being, rates of depression, anxiety, and cyberbullying have yet to improve. Though a myriad of solutions may be proposed to the aforementioned problems, what remains clear is that what we have currently is not working.
Social media use is inextricably tied to mental health risks, and is, therefore, a critical factor in the social-emotional well-being of children. Social media use is nearly ubiquitous among adolescents, inevitably affecting parents, teachers, and entire schools. Yet still, there remains a lack of meaningful conversation or norm-setting around social media use.
Our curriculum’s bottom-up approach encourages active engagement, communication, and shared responsibility for the creation of positive norms around and a deeper understanding of social media. We address the needs of students, parents, and teachers who are negatively affected by harmful social media use by catalyzing dialogue among everyone, whereas parents have historically been presumed solely responsible for the daunting task of protecting their children online.
Our solution offers a comprehensive intellectual experience for students as they navigate social media and its effects on their personal, professional, and academic lives. By developing healthy social media mindsets and usage, we forecast mitigating the negative effects of social media on individuals. We believe our equity-centered framework has the potential to be effective in supporting low-income students of color and serves to close the professional gap in support of upward mobility.
Ten years ago, I started teaching middle school in the South Side of Chicago at a low-income school serving primarily African-American students. While fighting and bullying have been around in schools, social media-related conflict was new. The longer I taught, it only worsened. No matter how many restorative conversations or best practices I brought to mediate and resolve conflict, the permanent online record of student conflict posed significant ramifications.
Even if students were not directly involved in the conflict, they wanted to record, post, share, like, and comment. Conflict and gossip spread like wildfire. What used to be a fight amongst friends could easily be broadcast in an instant without bounds.
School policies to collect phones from students were largely ineffectual. This problem ate away at me for years. No matter how strong my classroom management was, at fostering trusting relationships, and building a sense of community among students, it was easily shattered by a single post. I spoke with students, colleagues, principals, school security, and community members, and there was strong agreement it was a challenge that significantly hurt students beyond their schoolwork, especially for those involved.
Over time, I realized the problem was starting earlier than middle school as fellow teachers in third and fourth grades began to share how their students were affected by smartphone and social media use. Despite problems impacting children within the school, our ability to respond was limited because it was not considered to be within our responsibility. This was particularly concerning as I taught in a neighborhood school grappling with concentrated violence, poverty, and limited educational resources. These students already faced significant social-emotional challenges.
To form an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the problem, I spent the last two years studying the issue extensively. Bringing together a team of peers, we used systems thinking to analyze the problem. We also listened to the experiences and concerns of a wide range of stakeholders in Chicago. This included students, parents, community members, teachers, school principals, and safety and security personnel. Collectively, we explored existing solutions within the current landscape. I delved into academic research on learning science, adaptive learning, media, social media, youth mental health, and developmental psychology
Even children from supportive households are struggling with problems associated with negative social media mindsets and use. I have maintained my ties to students, their families, fellow educators, and community members in Chicago. This deep understanding of the community’s needs informed the development of our social media education curriculum. It holistically considers the needs and perspectives of stakeholders while remaining realistic around implementation and constraints.
Social media is here to stay, and stakeholders like parents, schools, and even social media companies recognize the need for solutions. As an educator, I understand the challenges in the classroom and the unique needs of each student. Schools desperately need a social media education curriculum and services that empower students, support teachers, and extend the conversation into home. We recognize that there is no one answer as social media’s impact varies across contexts and individuals.
- Provide the skills that people need to thrive in both their community and a complex world, including social-emotional competencies, problem-solving, and literacy around new technologies such as AI.
- 3. Good Health and Well-Being
- 4. Quality Education
- Pilot
We have developed a pilot curriculum and a beta version of a pre/post-assessment that's currently being tested with sixth graders at a neighborhood school. We've seen positive student engagement and are using the results of our pre/post-assessment to refine our product. We have established a strong partnership with the school administrator, who is sponsoring us to become a vendor with Chicago Public Schools.
To personalize the learning experience for a wider audience, we've built a framework for adaptive learning. This framework will be partially applied as we expand our pilot curriculum to other grades in Fall 2024. To achieve this, we are actively building partnerships with at least ten schools across Chicago Public Schools, private schools, charter schools, and afterschool service providers.
Solve’s network of impact-minded leaders would be invaluable as we expand our reach beyond Chicago. Having seen the problem’s national scope, we want to help as many children, families, and educators as possible. Solve’s network offers a platform to connect with mentors and experts in impact investing, venture capital, and educational leadership, providing us with crucial guidance for our growth. My experience in Chicago and at The University of Chicago highlighted the power of a strong network, building connections, and collaboration, and I am eager to learn from others tackling similar challenges.
By growing our network, I plan to forge strategic partnerships to structure an economically sustainable business, devise new marketing strategies, and establish relationships with other education organizations and leaders to share best practices and expand our reach. We will improve our business model while developing new ways to adapt our curriculum and expansion strategy. All these partnerships will directly support our mission of empowering adolescents to become critical consumers of social media. As KindEd scales nationally, we are committed to creating mutually beneficial partnerships within the education sector.
Participating in the Obama Foundation Scholars program was a transformative experience. Being surrounded by diverse and mission-driven peers was inspiring and motivating. The program provided experiences in leadership development, action planning, and executive coaching, which have been instrumental in advancing our social impact work, particularly as we navigate the challenges of bringing new curricula into schools.
In Chicago, we are building momentum by directly reaching out to individual schools, charter networks, and afterschool programs. However, the problem of social media among youth extends far beyond. After demonstrating the effectiveness of our curriculum and instructional approach, we need greater reach and credibility to achieve our goal to help as many children as possible. Solve’s network and recognition would be invaluable in this pursuit. By connecting with national and international partners through Solve, we can overcome barriers to entry in new school districts outside Chicago and Illinois.
Social media and the rise of AI-generated content both have the ability to significantly influence youth. These are critical, global issues that extend far beyond just impacting youth mental health. They contribute to the creation of echo chambers and blur the lines between truth and popularity. KindEd empowers students to become critical consumers of information and responsible online citizens, leading to improvements in mental health, school culture, and civic engagement.
While our goal is to equip millions of students in the US and internationally with our product, we simply cannot do it alone. Through Solve’s network and resources, KindEd has the potential to transform the social media landscape for millions, unleashing goodness and cultivating a generation of responsible users online and offline.
- Legal or Regulatory Matters
- Monitoring & Evaluation (e.g. collecting/using data, measuring impact)
- Product / Service Distribution (e.g. delivery, logistics, expanding client base)
- Public Relations (e.g. branding/marketing strategy, social and global media)
- Technology (e.g. software or hardware, web development/design)

Founder
